Europe And The New World :: essays research papers fc

Europe and the New WorldTutorial Question wherefore were the westerlyers (Spanish, English, Portugueses, French etc) able to displace the native peoples of America with, seemingly, relative ease? Was this evidence of a superior refining?Many believe that there is a great difference in the midst of westerners and the native people of the lands they conquered. The truth is, that there is non great distinction, draw off in the minds of white men. Westerners much(prenominal) as the French, Spanish, English and Portuguese induct always believed in their own superiority. This confidence gave them the strength to displace the natives and also the justification for doing so. The civilized world seemed to grow, and change with new directions being master all the time, the non civilized world seemed to stand still in a era recognized by Europeans as unprogressive and primitive. The Europeans viewed the Native Americans with mixed whim, in many ways they despised their ignorance, wh ile at the aforesaid(prenominal) time being in awe of their innocence. Despite this, leading opinion was that the native people of the new world were inferior to the Europeans and would ingest to stick domesticated if they were to survive in the new world. However was this triumph everywhere the inhabitants of the land evidence of a superior civilisation? How does one particularise Civilisation? For if we are to discuss what is a superior and an inferior speed up then understanding of the term civilisation is critical. The term civilisation is employ everyday and is understood by everyone, yet a proper comment is more(prenominal) difficult to pin down. The oxford university dictionary defines civilisation as a developed or advanced sate of human society. This is helpful, yet the apparent motion of how developed or how advanced is still relevant. Others have said that a civilized society is different from an uncivilized society because of certain attributes such as writing, cities, building etc. But agreement is difficult, it is much more safer not to rely on a single definition, instead note at examples of what everyone has agreed to call civilisations such as Greek or Rome . However, the term civilisation still seems to be from a western point of view, for natives are not seen as civilized because they do not fit into any definition mentioned above. The Native Americans were not advanced, they did not have buildings or cities and their lifestyle and customs had hardly resembled that of Greece or Rome.