Immaculate Perception

The side of immaculate perception is a false one. righteous perception describes a pure and un sully perception, one that has no bias. prepossess is acquired with populates and teachings, both of which create expectancy, which taints perception with bias. One may argue that a newborn baby has immaculate perception, a clean slate with no expectations or sensory faculty conditioning. However, this point bunsnot be proved because where is the division amidst the experiences of the mother and the baby, or is in that respect even a division amidst the twain? Does the babys formation count as an experience? With no fresh answers to these suspenses how can immaculate perception occur in reality? This question leads to another one. What is reality and how does it relate to perception?Reality is the truth that we analyze to ultimately reach by means of perception as we sort by dint of our sense datum. Yet, this truth can vary between people. The conclusion or truth that people search for through perception analysis can be determined by ones own needs and expectations. Though both creatures may be exposed to identical stimuli and sense datum their inferences achieved through perception will vary greatly because each has a tainted or biased perception. For example, a human and a frank be both put in a forest where they are alienated and must find their way home office.The person will rely super on sight to sort through the wilderness and arrive home safely because he has conditioned himself to rely heavily on the sense of sight while, the dog may rely on scent more so then sight to track his way home. Both founder perception that has been flawed or somewhat polluted. Both the human and dog are exposed to the same stimuli yet they each perceive their situations differently. This is cod to their biased perception, the human through anterior experiences has conditioned himself to perceive his experiences generally through sight while the dog has done the same but with smell, neither has an unprejudiced perception because both have been conditioned through experiences.Perception is realizeled and created by experience. The goal of perceiving is to know your surroundings. However your surroundings control your experiences. Therefore perceiving is a way of analyzing your experiences. But if this is true then there is no such thing as immaculate perception.Every individuals experiences are each unique. The way in which they are accepted or jilted depends on cultural conditioning as well as previous experiences. With this bias no one can claim to have unswayed or virgin perception because it has been trained to only acknowledge trusted elements of the surrounding. For example, I have been trained to rely on sight to pucker the bulk of my knowledge of my surroundings but a blind person would have trained their senses or perception tools very differently having no sight. Therefore each experience and the sense datum gained f rom it would be different.The stance of immaculate perception claims that since the act of perceiving has no bias each experience for every person results in the same knowledge. This is false because it is impossible for two beings to infer the same information from a protocol. In a globe made of unique creatures its impossible for immaculate perception to exist.