Chicken Run Essay Example for Free

Chicken Run EssayThe implications if a major customers had gone into is level, it ordain imply the troupe cash flow because e real consecratement received the confederation whitethorn shake off to use it to cover its operating expenses apart from getting profit. pile up debtors will show the collection part performance. Low cash flow will affect m some(prenominal) areas in an organization. The corporation may have to kick in another loan to run it business. Other than that it may have conundrum to run the business if the cash flow is low. For example, if the company unable to pay the suppliers on time. The supplier may stop to supply product to the company. If the suppliers really stop supplying product, the company may face problem to produce product. This will straight affect the company sales because its fail to produce product to its customers. If the company do not work hard to reduce this important area they may be looking at legal remedies, or even write off de bts and that means spending money to get money.The other implication is that, the company will have a very unhealthy debtors aging. Where it is supposed to be a guidelines to the company. For example when a debtor reach it limit, the company should be alerted to chase payment based on the debtors aging. But in this case, Encik Selamat has been giving authority to the marketing department to continue supply products to Cold prosperous Sdn Bhd because of the closed relationship. Indirectly, it showsthat Encik Selamat does not performing his duty rationally. Which effect his image as a manager. He is supposed to show his leadership by having a very good judgement. For example to stop supply products to Cold Gold Sdn Bhd until they settle their debts.Refer to the case Chicken Runi) How would you assess the financial health of the company?I would assess the financial health of the company based on the gross profit of the company. The higher the gross profit the healthier it is. Of cours e we have to consider the operating expenses of the company but operating expenses are still under the company arrest and discretion before we can get the engagement profit.Other than that, I would assess the financial health of the company by obtaining a history of your companys financial statements. Five years outlay is usually a good base. Next, convert the financial statements to common size. Common size financial statements are simply a companys financials uttered in the form of percentages rather than dollars. A common size format readily identifies trends and process patterns. Additionally, since industry benchmark data is often produced in this format, it agrees it easier to par the results with the competition. Industry benchmark information can be obtained from a commercial vendor, accountant, or depending upon the industry, from trade associations.Next, financial ratios are calculated. There are a subprogram of ratios to choose from. Some of the more common measure liquidity, debt coverage, leverage, and operating and profit performance. Their relevance is dependent upon your company, its operating characteristics and the industry. Bankers and accountants can be especially useful in identifying the more pertinent ratios.The information gathered thus far is analyzed and compiled on a trended, composite and industry basis. The results of this analysis, when performedregularly, help you to monitor and recognize the critical statistics necessary for the success and growth of your business. The benefits of this assessment include Competitive Advantages DisadvantagesAn industry assessment enables you to identify your companys strengths and weaknesses and acquire valuable information on the competition.Budgeting ForecastingStudying trends and growth patterns is a very effective preliminary step in preparing internal budgets and forecasts.Strategic PlanningRecognizing specific performance measurements (company and industry) will help to set goals and objectives for the future (e.g., increasing sales, gross profit margins, and net income).Acquisition OpportunitiesKnowledge of key performance measurements assists in the evaluation of a proposed sale, nuclear fusion reaction or acquisition.FocusGreater awareness of the interrelationship of the financial statements and a complete understanding of financial operations allows you to focus on the areas important to the growth and success of your business.ii) What would you suggest as appropriate course of actions?As an appropriate course of actions, I would suggest the directors to refer the Malaysian Code on incarnate Governance 2012 as a guidelines to take action against Encik Selamat which involves in unethical activities such as conflict of interest and lack of integrity.Other than that, the internal control of the company should be revised. For example the debtor collection procedures. It has to follow proper standard operating procedures such as when invoices issue to a cus tomers, the payment harm must follow the credit period. Any payment overdue must be chase every month. If it reach the 120 days amount overdue, pattern letter should beissue to the debtors, then stop supplying product to the debtors until payment made.Besides that, Internal Audit must be done regularly. This is to canvass the operation run based on the standard operating procedures. Any discrepancy found must be rectify immediately to avoid any unwanted issue to happen. For example, Ms Choy has discovered that the credit limit of Cold Gold Sdn Bhd, one of its major customers had gone into its level and yet the marketing department continued to supply products to the company. If the company do internal audit regularly, this issue may not happen because the internal auditor will detect the problem while it is still under early stage. Other than that, this will avoid Encik Selamat from making unethical activities due to his awareness from the internal auditor.Monthly meeting in add ition can help in this case. Where, Encik Selamat required to report the company performance monthly. In this case, the company should have monthly credit meeting. The purpose of this meeting is to make sure all debtors are monitored closely. Any amount hanging in the debtors aging should have remarks or the status should have been identified. For example, if the debts is not paid deep down the 30 days period, it should state the reason why? At least we know that chasing of debts run actively by the collection department. If the debtors do not pay according to their credit period, the management at least can give suggestion and acknowledge about that issue.

Viruses-smallpox Essay Example for Free

Viruses-smallpox EssayFBI data reveals over 10000 bombings resulting in 355 deaths and over 3ooo injuries between 1990 and 1995. Based on FBI data calculations, slightly 70% of domestic terrorist incidents involve some type of explosives Analysts need to be aware that explosive devices can be comprised of wide variety of materials. The number of chemic, biological, and atomic attack incidents are not as startling as those of conventional explosives mentioned above. The Center for Non-Proliferation Studies, in 2ooo CSIS report, showed that in 1999 there were 175 reports of chemical substance, biological, and nuclear terrorism, 1o4 of which occurred in the U. S.This was dramatic increase over the database findings in February, 2000 of total of 687 incidents since 1900. Definitive numbers are difficult to attain. The Center uses the media as its source of information, and it was noted that apparent increases capacity be attributed to hoaxes and different reporting methods. R egardless of the true numbers, there definitely appears to be an increase in the use or the perceived use of these agents. on that point are numerous biological agents that can be employed by terrorists. (Rick 2004 96).The U. S.Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases lists the following diseases and biological toxins as potentially suitable for introduction into the population by deliberate dispersal 1. Bacterial infections-anthrax, cholera, plague, tularemia, and Q fever 2. Viruses-smallpox, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, and viral hemorrhagic fevers 3.Biological toxins-botulinum, staphylococcal enterotoxin B, ricin, and T-2 Mycotoxins chemical substance agents have been used in warfare for years, even by law enforcement in the form 1. Nerve agents-Sarin (GB) 2. Vesicants-Mustard gas (HD, H), Lewisite (L) 3. Lung-damaging agents-Phosgene.4. Cyanide 5. Riot- ascendency agents-CS and CN Methods of exposure to the biological and chemical agents mentioned above include the following 1. Absorption (through the skin) 2. Ingestion (swallowing or eating) 3. Inhalation (breathing) 4. Injection (usually through hypodermic syringe) The above chemical and biological concerns are critical components for analyzing materials and data, but greater concern exists for the first responder. It is one thing to analyze information about WMD, but it is the first responders of the world who will encounter, usually unsuspectingly, chemical and biological agents.Therefore it is essential that information be made immediately available to them as it is discovered, and that they be properly trained in all aspects of this extremely dangerous situation. Many how-to documents are available, some covering chemical and biological agents. In the previously mentioned terrorism training manual document seized in Manchester, England, military Studies in the Jihad against the Tyrants several poisons were described in detail. Included in this compendium was information on extr acts or derivatives of herbal and plant products that can be used to make substances such as ricin.During JTF NA, the USAFE/LG staff was organized into control cells to manage the combat support infrastructure, including the distribution system. (Rick 2004 93) With no policy to guide them, these control cells developed new reporting procedures to meet the needs of their customers. Innovative reporting and control processes were critical to the decision-making required to execute combat support as operations escalated. 6 These control cells resemble aspects of the CSC2 TO-BE operational architecture now being implemented. (Robert et al 2004 29)

Effect of The Human Rights Act 1998

Effect of The piece Rights crop 1998Section 3(1) of the Human Rights flake 1998 provides that So far as it is possible todo so, primary legislation and qualified legislation must be read and given effect ina way which is matched with the design rights. Whilst this does not affectthe validity, continuing procedure or enforcement of any contradictory primarylegislation, or affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of anyincompatible subordinate legislation, national legislation must be completelyincapable of being compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights forthe Courts in the UK to deliver a declaration of incompatibility, rather than to go out the legislation in favour of the party relying upon a Convention right.Regarding the recital of the Convention rights, subdivision 2(1) of the HumanRights dress 1998 states A court or tribunal determining a interrogate which has arisenin connection with a Convention right must take into account any ( a) judgment, finish, declaration or advisory opinion of the European Court of Human Rights, (b)opinion of the Commission given in a report adopted under Article 31 of theConvention, (c) decision of the Commission in connection with Article 26 or 27(2) ofthe Convention, or (d) decision of the Committee of Ministers taken under Article 46of the Convention, whenever made or given, so far as, in the opinion of the court ortribunal, it is relevant to the proceedings in which that question has arisen. The Courthas held that, when scrutinizing executive decisions and determining their compliencewith the Human Rights passage, section 2 of this Act compels them to take into accountthe jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. However, it has beenmade clear that The courts argon not bound by the decisions of the European Court.This was confirmed in the fictional character of Boyd v The Army Prosecuting Authority.However, in the case of R v Secretary of the State for the Home Dep artment, a caseconcerning an alledged fault of Article 8 of the ECHR it was held, in reliance onthe cases of Campbell v United Kingdom and R. v Secretary of the State for theHome Department (Ex p. Leech), that when assessing the validity of an executiveaction, the court must rule on the proportionality of the executive decision in question.Article 8(2) of the ECHR states There shall be no interference by a public authoritywith the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and isnecessary in a democratic companionship in the interests of national security, public safety orthe economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, forthe security measures of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms ofothers. The Queens Bench held that where an executive decision sought toinfringe Article 8(1) of the ECHR, that an investigation into the proportionality of thatdecision is required by virtue of Article 8(2) of t hat Convention.From these new-fangled case decisions it is immediately clear that the Human Rights Act1998 has had a major impact on the pre-existing public law framework of the UnitedKingdom. The Courts be bound to interpret national legislation in accordance withthe rights contained in the ECHR, even where this means that national legislation hasto be interpreted beyond its unfeigned or purposive backdrop, and the Courts have showincreasing willingness to be influenced by European jurisprudence when interpretingthe Convention. On top of this, it seems that the case of R v Secretary of the State forthe Home Department has introduced proportionality as a new grounds forcommencing a judicial review of an exectuive decision.To this extent, the Human Rights Act 1998 must be considered a tenet of the temperament of the United Kingdom, at least to the extent that it impacts upon thescope of the legitimate powers of the executive. However, that being said, section 3(2)of the Human Rig hts Act and the interpretation of this section by the House of Lordsin the case of R v A (No.2) does suggest that where the legislative enact legislationwhich purports to expressly limit the scope of a Convention right, the Courts are notentitled to rules in favour of a claimant, by reinterpreting that provision.Let us now ask ourselves an important question For an Act to be integral surelyit must be the case that the legislature cannot bypass its provisions, while it remains inforce, simply by indicating its life to do so, or acknowledging that it does so?Let us therefore turn to examine how the Courts deal with cases where legislation iscompletely incompatible with the rights conferred under the ECHR, or where thepolitical science have acknowledged that a new Bill is incompatible with the ECHRIn regards to incompatible legislation, section 4(2) of the Human Rights Act 1998states If the court is satisfied that a provision is incompatible with a Conventionright, it may make a decl aration of that incompatibility. Section 4(4) of the Act goeson to provide that If the court is satisfied- (a) that the provision is incompatiblewith a Convention right, and (b) that (disregarding any possibility of revocation) theprimary legislation concerned prevents removal of the incompatibility, it may make adeclaration of that incompatibility. The effect of such a declaration, however, isneither to go to sleep that legislation invalid and ineffective, nor to provide the parties inthe case with a form of redress, but rather to alert the executive that the legislation inquestion is incompatibe. notwithstanding the fact that the Courts have made it clear that adeclaration of incompatibility is a last resort, in order to argue that the HumanRights Act 1998 is a constitutional enactment, it must be shown that where thelegislative have introduced legislation which is incompatible with its provisions, thatthey have acted beyond their constitutional powers.In regards to statements o f compatibility, it is clear that the legislature are legallyentitled to enact a Bill without such a statement, as per s19(1)(b) of the 1998 Act. Anexample of such an Act is the Sexual Offences Act 2005. This must be deemed toundermine the UKs commitment to abiding by the rights enshrined in the ECHR.Earlier in this essay we have asked the question For an Act to be constitutional surelyit must be the case that the legislature cannot bypass its provisions, while it remains inforce, simply by indicating its intent to do so, or acknowledging that it does so? In shadowy of the fact that the Act does not impose any duty of action on the executive toamend incompatible legislation, nor to make sure legislation is compatible before it isenacted, it cannot be said to undermine the constitutional nature of this Act becausethe legislature are not acting outside of the scope of their powers in the legislation.If this stock is correct, then we must ask ourselves what characteristics of theHuman Rights Act 1998 suggests that it has found a place at the flavor of theconstitution of the United Kingdom?In the case of Thoburn v Sunderland City Council, Lord Justice Laws defined aconstitutional statute in the following terms In my opinion a constitutional statuteis one which (a) conditions the legal relationship between citizen and State in somegeneral, overarching manner, or (b) enlarges or diminishes the scope of what wewould now regard as innate constitutional rights. (a) and (b) are of necessityclosely related it is difficult to think of an instance of (a) that is not also an instanceof (b).We have already seen how the Courts have employ the Act to give significant force tothe ECHR, interpreting legislation widely to give effect to the Convention rights,allowing decisions by public bodies to be challenged for being a disproportionatebreach of Convention rights and only issuing declarations of incompatibility as a lastresort. These features of the Human Rights Act 1998 an d the way it has been appliedby the Courts surely satisfies Lord Justice Laws definition.This supports the contention that the Human Rights Act 1998 is part of theconstitution of the UK, but does not confirm whether it has truly found a place at the kernel of the constitution. Let us now look at new-fashioned political developments that serveto undermine this assertionIn England there is currently oftentimes talk about the possibility of repealing the HumanRights Act. For example, in 2006 David Cameron made a public statement that theConservatives would scrap, reform or replace the Human Rights Act unless the government could reach a memorandum of understanding to enable foreigncriminals to be deported to their countries of origin. Guardian, May 12 2006.Likewise, a recent Review of the Implementation of the Human Rights Act, stated itis worth considering briefly an option which has been subject to recent comment. Thiswould be the option of repealing the Human Rights Act and enact ing a separate set offundamental rights which would not, in law, be connected to the EuropeanConvention on Human Rights. The suggestion is that these rights could be given somesort of entrenched or superior circumstance in our constitution. DCA, 2006, p5.These sources strongly imply that the Human Rights Act 1998 has not found a placein the heart of our constitution, despite there being myopic doubt about its constitutionalnature. In the final section of this paper, let us turn our attention to the place of theHuman Rights Act 1998 in the constitution of Scotland, and its prospects for thefuture in this devolved jurisdictionIn Scotland, the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998 were given greater force bythe introduction of the Scotland Act 1998. Section 29 of this Act states (1) An Actof the Scottish Parliament is not law so far as any provision of the Act is outside thelegislative competence of the Parliament. (2) A provision is outside that competenceso far as any of the follow ing paragraphs apply (d) it is incompatible with any ofthe Convention rights or with Community law. This goes oftentimes further than theHuman Rights Act 1998 which allows UK Parliament to enact incompatibleprovisions as long as an assessment has been made in accordence with s19(1)(b) ofthe Act.Coupled with the recent enactment of the Scottish Commission for Human Rights Act2006, which established the Scottish Commission for Human Rights, it seems clearthat the ECHR has found a central place in the constitution of the devolvedjurisdiction of Scotland. However, in response to the statement at the top of thispaper, we can hardly say that these developments put the Human Rights Act at theheart of the constitution of the United Kingdom after all, these developments do notpertain to the Human Rights Act 1998, except in so far as this Act is used to definethe Convention rights which are to be adhered to by the Scottish executive.ConclusionIn conclusion, whilst the Human Risghts Act 1998 can certainly be exposit as aconstitution enactment, recent political developments in the UK which suggest thatthis Act might soon be repealed undermine the contention that the 1998 is at theheart of the constitution of the United Kingdom.In Scotland, the Human Rights Act 1998 can only be said to be at the heart of theconstitution to the extent that this Act is referred to by the Scotland Act 1998, an Actwhich goes much further in granting legal protection to scotish citizens for breachesof Convention rights than the 1998 Act.

Encountering God And Excuses Excuses Religion Essay

Encountering graven image And Excuses Excuses Religion Es hypothesizeT here(predicate)s a story of a sparing discus thrower from the nineteenth century. In the days before personal trainers, he developed his skills by himself in the Scottish highlands near his village. He do his own iron discus from a description he read in a book. What he did non know was that the discus used in competition was made of wood with an proscribeder rim of iron. The discus he made was solid metal and weighed three or four times as much as the ones used by his would-be competitors. This committed Scotsman marked break through in his field the distance of the current record throw for fore actually(prenominal) of Britain and trained day and night to be able to match it. For nearly a year, he labored under the self imposed offcome of the special weight. He became very, very good. He reached the point where he could throw his iron discus the record distance, maybe farther. He was construct. He tr aveled s come forwardh to England for his low competition. When he arrived at the games, they relegateed him the regulation wooden discus, which he promptly threw same(p) a tea saucer, worry wed throw a Frisbee. He set a new record,a distance so far beyond those of his challengers that no one could touch him. He thus remained the uncontested headliner for year after year after year. From that present moment on his behavior had a defining image Train under a great burden and you pass on be so far beyond the rest of the world you will be untouchable.Each one of us has a story that tells us who we are. Every life is defined by a narrative. There was a time when our culture had such a defining story. The hours of the day were marked by the ringing of church bells. We lived Anno Domini inthe year of our Lord. Our role models were the lives of the saints. When we left we state, perfection be with you, which we birth today compressed into our word, Goodbye. exactly todays role m odels are picture give stars and sports celebrities. Our greeting is deal a nice day. Oh, once in a while a story will come along, like the terrible cataclysm or a terrorist threat, and pull us all to fascinateher for a moment or two. Or we find a kind of togetherness in substantial for a sports team.I dont know ab fall out you, unless I yearn to hitch my itty bitty life to some grand story that makes invariablyy moment throb with meaning and purpose and excitement and adventure. Ive found that story for me in the pages of this book the script. This book tells me the hunger in my heart corresponds with the reality of the uni write. Thats why I like the name of our radio programme Word Alive.Theres a idol who lacks to enlist you and me to join him in loving, redeeming, and restoring the world. And this beau ideal comes to you the same way he came to an adrift(p) wanderer named Moses centuries ago.To meet this paragon is to discover why youre alive and on this planet. S o howbig an adventure are you up for today? Are you ready to stop watching other muckles reality represents and star in one of your own as one of Gods everyday heroes?Lets tempo into Gods story today as we continue a series of messages on the foundational event of the Bible, God leading the children of Israel out of Egypt.JaneThank you for joining us for todays Word Alive with Dr. Derek Stringer and Im Jane Moxon Ill be commenting from time to time.Derek has been acquireing from the life of Moses and explaining how we crumb encounter God today and get His direction for our lives making it signifi lurch and of value.Heres Derek DerekAnd thanks for your help Jane.Have you ever been reluctant to take a bawl? I tactile sensation at weve all have been at that place, especially now that many of us have caller ID on our phones. Have you ever gotten a call, looked at the ID and accordingly were reluctant to take the call? I am so thankful for the ex-directory in England because I conceive of every salesman in the country knew when I sat down for a meal. They would decide thats the time were going to call Derek Stringer.Incidentally, someone has come up with a list of twenty responses to use with these telemarketers. I like several of them, but one is my absolute favourite and one of these days Im going to get up the courage to do it.It suggests Tell the telemarketer you are busy at the moment and ask him if he will give you his home phone repress so you can call him back up. When the telemarketer explains that they cannot give out their home number, say, I guess you dont want anyone bothering you at home, remedy? When he says, Yes, then you say, Me neitherLets pose it weve all had calls at times that we honest didnt want to take, and we were reluctant to answer. I want us to consider the fact that sometimes were reluctant to answer the call even when we know that its God whos doing the art.I want to talk a pocketable bit about what it means to be called by God.JaneAs we get Gods call of Moses at the burning provide, we meet that God doesnt call us the same way that he called Moses, but he does call us.DerekIn fact, you may recall that the Greek word for church is ekklesia. It literally means, the called out. We are the called out hatful of God. Peter said, You are.his own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.I know that this broadcast will reach people who make no claim to be Christians. And I want you to understand that God is calling you this very day, calling you to make the decision to acquire a child of God.Many who listen to this broadcast are Christians whom God is calling to greater heights of service. There are liaisons that God wants you to do for him. There are people that God wants you to talk to. God is calling you to proclaim the praises of Him who brought you out of darkness and into the marvellous light.As we look at the call o f Moses, I want you to consider how God is calling you.JaneWere going to look at the starting signal part of Exodus 4.DerekWhen I say Moses, what comes to mind?The old Hollywood Movie with the piercing blue of eyes of Moses Charlton Heston standing before the throne of Pharaoh Yul Brenner? When we romanticize Moses we create distance between ourselves and him. The more distance you put between yourself and any Bible character, the less help the character provides us in our life before God. The real Moses?He was probably a lot more like Charlie Brown. In one of my favourite Peanuts cartoons Lucy says, Life, Charlie Brown, is like a deck chair. comparable a what? he says. Havent you ever been on a cruise ship, Charlie Brown? Passengers unfold up these canvas deck chairs so they can sit in the sun. Some people place their chairs facing the rear of the ship so they can see where theyve been. Other people example their chairs forward. They want to see where theyre going. On the cruis e ship of life, Charlie Brown, which way is your deck chair facing? Charlie thinks a minuteand says Gee, Ive never been able to get one unfolded.Ever feel like that? Like people all most you are going somewhere in life and you cant even unfold the deck chair? tho as the curtain rises on the man who will become the most important person in the Bible, atomic number 16 only to Jesus, Moses is a foot-dragging loser. Moses had it madein Egypt, then killed a man and fled for his life. Ever since, hed been going nowhere. What do you say to someone 80 years old who doesnt know what he wants to be when he grows up? (Someone has said the former adults are always asking childrenwhat are you going to be when you grow up? is because we dont know ourselves and were looking for suggestions.)Moses was tending his father-in-laws sheep not even his own in the desert of Midian. He squinted out across the parched landscape in search of shrubs for the hungry animals and noticed a bush on fire that did not burn up. As he came closer to investigate, suddenly a voice spoke to Moses out of the fire. Moses rim fell open at a bush ablaze with God I have indeed seen the misery of my people in Egypt. I have heard them inst out because of their slave drivers, and I am relate about their suffering. So I have come down to rescue them from the hand of the Egyptians.JaneYoull recall from our sometime(prenominal) couple of lessons that Moses is at the burning bush.DerekGod has revealed to Moses his sacred name I AM, Yahweh and God has announced that he has chosen Moses to go to tell Pharaoh to let His people, the Hebrews, go.Jane therefore Moses answered and said, But suppose they will not believe me or listen to my voice suppose they say, The superior has not appeared to you. So the LORD said to him, What is that in your hand? And he said, A rod. And He said, Cast it on the ground. So he cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent and Moses fled from it. and then the LORD said t o Moses, Reach out your hand and take it by the tail (and he reached out his hand and caught it, and it became a rod in his hand), that they may believe that the LORD God of their fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has appeared to you.DerekFurthermore the LORD said to him, instanter put your hand in your bosom. And he put his hand in his bosom, and when he took it out, behold, his hand was leprous, like snow. And He said, Put your hand in your bosom again. So he put his hand in his bosom again, and move it out of his bosom, and behold, it was restored like his other flesh.JaneThen it will be, if they do not believe you, nor heed the message of the set-back sign, that they may believe the message of the latter(prenominal) sign. And it shall be, if they do not believe even these two signs, or listen to your voice, that you shall take water from the river and pour it on the dry land. And the water which you take from the river will become blood on t he dry land.DerekThen Moses said to the LORD, O my Lord, I am not eloquent, neither before nor since You have spoken to Your servant but I am slow of speech and slow of tongue. So the LORD said to him, Who has made mans mouth? Or who makes the mute, the deaf, the seeing, or the blind? Have not I, the LORD? Now therefore, go, and I will be with your mouth and teach you what you shall say.JaneBut he said, O my Lord, please send by the hand of whomever else You may send. So the anger of the LORD was kindled against Moses, and He said Is not Aaron the Levite your brother? I know that he can speak well. And look, he is also coming out to meet you. When he sees you, he will be corpus sternum in his heart. Now you shall speak to him and put the words in his mouth. And I will be with your mouth and with his mouth, and I will teach you what you shall do. So he shall be your spokesman to the people. And he himself shall be as a mouth for you, and you shall be to him as God. And you shall tak e this rod in your hand, with which you shall do the signs.DerekGod comes to Moses with a job to do. I want you to understand that when God has a job he wants you to do, he doesnt ask you he tells you. He doesnt extend an invitation he gives a commission. God said to Abraham, You go to this place I will show you. He said to Elijah, Go, present yourself to Ahab. Jesus said to his disciples, Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.But now the call of God comes to Moses and Moses doesnt want to answer the phone. And I can understand a little bit of what Moses is thinking. Have you ever been asked to go back to the place of your absolute greatest failure? I would imagine that everybody can think of a place or think of a person that frankly you wouldnt mind if you never motto that place or that person again. Because it brings back a memory of a time when you blew it on a scale you dont even like to think about.And when we dont want to do something, we tend to make excuses, and thats exactly what Moses does here. Lets look at some of his excuses and as we do so, were going to notice that were still making the same excuses today.The first excuse Moses made was, I dont have any credibility.JaneHe said in verse one, What if they dont believe me and they say, The Lord did not appear to you?DSNow Moses question may seem to be valid, but its actually a denial of Gods clear promise because if you look back in chapter 3, verse 18, God said, The elders of Israel will listen to you and Moses says, in essence, Yes, but what if they dont? Now that shows you what failure can do to a mans thinking. If we have tried and we have failed, it has a way of inhibiting us, it has a way of paralyzing us for years to come. In Moses mind, he was certain that he was damaged goods. There was no way that he could ever go back to the Hebrews and effectively exercise any authority in their eyes. He says, Lord, youve got the wrong guy. Ive got no credibility with those pe ople.Now God graciously recognizes what Moses is worried about and the bother hes facing. So what God says is, All right, Moses, heres what were going to do. Im going to give you some authenticating miracles so that you can be convinced that you do have my credibility and you can be a man they can listen to.The first thing God says is, Take that staff and throw it down. So he did. It became a ophidian and the Bible says that Moses ran away from it. Now theres finally one thing that Moses and I have in common. If we see snakes, we both run away from them. I do not understand people who want snakes for pets.Snake experts will tell you that most snakes are not poisonous, and you can tell the pit vipers theyre the poisonous ones they have these little pits behind their snouts. I remember hearing that for the first time and thinking, You idiot I dont ever intend to be close enough to the face of a snake to see if hes got pits You dont take any chances. You see a snake, you run.Now Go d knows exactly what hes doing with Moses. Hes got to deal with Moses fear. So that thing becomes a snake. And then what did he say next? Pick it up by the tail. You dont do that to snakes But God said, Pick it up by the tail. And Moses obeyed. And it turned into a staff.JaneThen God said, Put your hand in your cloak.DerekAnd Moses did, and when it came out it was covered with leprosy. You need to remember you couldnt cure leprosy in those days. Leprosy was fatal. You dont think Moses was afraid? Whats God doing? Hes teaching Moses, Listen, the things that you think are deadly are nothing in my hands. Like Pharaoh. The things that frighten you dont need to frighten you. You dont need to be afraid.And God says, Moses, you dont need to promote your authority. You serious need to report and represent my authority. God has all the credibility he needs to deliver people from their bondage. You and I dont need to worry about credibility. sometimes I make the mistake of thinking, Theres n othing I can say that will change this persons life. Who am I that he should listen to me?Folks, the authoritys not ours. Its Gods. Were exactly his ambassadors. We need to go and tell people what God said they need to hear, and Gods got enough credibility to take care of both of us.Janecapital of Minnesota said to the Thessalonians, For this reason we also thank God without ceasing, because when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God.DerekAnd so, the second excuse. He said to God, I dont have the ability.JaneVerse 10, O my Lord, I am not eloquent, neither before nor since You have spoken to Your servant but I am slow of speech and slow of tongue.DerekIts strange that Moses should say that, because Stephen said in his sermon in Acts 7 that Moses was powerful in speech.So either Moses didnt want to admit his ability, or Moses had forgotten about his ability, or maybe after 40 years in the d esert, he felt like he lost that ability. But at any rate, Moses is absolutely persuaded, God, youve got the wrong man. I dont have the gifts. I dont have the ability.And it sounds as if Moses is being very humble. Lord, Im sightly not good enough.JaneHe said the same thing back in chapter 3 when God said to Moses, Im going to send you to Pharaoh, and Moses responded in verse 11, Who am I, that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt?DerekNow that sounds very humble, doesnt it? I hear Christians say the same thing all the time, Id love to teach a church class, but Im just dont have the ability. Id love to do this or do that, but I just dont feel qualified. And that sounds so very humble.After all, doesnt the Bible say we shouldnt think of ourselves more highly than we ought to think? I want you to learn something. Be careful not to confuse the virtue of humbleness with a spirit of inadequacy that causes us not to do Gods will.Now were supposed to deny self. S o if youre talking about a humility that denies self, thats good. But if youre talking about a humility that denies Gods ability to use you, thats not real humility. But thats what we often do. We often refuse the call of God under the guise of humility, when thats not what it is at all.When Moses says, I dont have the ability, this is not Moses being humble. This is Moses displaying a lack of faith. And again, Gods patience with his servant is amazing to me.JaneSo God says to Moses in verse 12, You go, and I will help you speak and Ill teach you what to say.DerekWell I want to make three quick points here about our feelings of inadequacy.First of all, God is aware of our weaknesses when he calls us.When Moses said to God, Im not eloquent, Im not a very gifted speaker, do you think God went, Oh, I forgot. Somebody pull up the file on Moses. If you say, God, you shouldnt train me because Ive got a lot of weaknesses, well then who in the world is he going to choose? Who doesnt?JaneP aul wrote, We have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellence of the power may be of God and not of us.DerekLets admit it, were all clay pots. Lets just admit our inability, dont hide it, but lets not be paralyzed by it. God knows our weakness when he calls us.Second point God never abandons us after he commissions us.You can search the scriptures all you want, but youre not going to find one time in the Bible where God gives a call and then he says, Now youre on your own.When he said to Abraham, Go to the land he said what? He said, that I will show you.JaneWhen Jesus said, Go into all the world he said what? He said, I will be with you always.DerekThis whole matter of saving the Israelites doesnt depend on Moses eloquence or his lack of it. It depends on the presence and the power of God. God says, Moses, you may not have all the answers, but youve got me, and thats all you need.Third thing If God commands you to do something, if God calls you to do something, he will empower you to do it.God does not ask the impossible, it just seems that way if you try to do it without God. But and this is very important God usually chooses to supply the ability only after youve stepped out on faith to answer the call. You say, God, I cant do that because I dont have the ability. God says, Well, Ill give you the ability. And we want to say, God, you give me the ability, and then Ill go do it. God says, No, thats not how it works. You go do it, and Ill give you the ability.Let me give you an example of what I mean by that. I wonder how many times Ive stood outside a hospital room knowing that someone inside was suffering, needing a word of comfort. And if I waited outside that room until I felt adequate, I would never go in. But I pray, God help me to say what needs to be said and you step in by faith and you find that when you act by faith, God will not let you down. But if you wait outside the door and say, Im not going in until I have something profound to say youll never go in. And so, what God often does is to say, I know you dont have the ability, I know youre just a clay pot, but if youll obey me, if youll step out in faith, then I will not let you down.I believe the key to self-confidence is to have the right view of God-confidence. Paul said, I can do all things. now thats self-confidence. But thats not what he said. He said, I can do all things through him who strengthens me. Its not humility to deny that God can use you. Rather, its a blatant insult to his grace.Now Gods been patient with Moses. Moses has had some legitimate concerns. Lord, I dont think I have any credibility. God says, Ill deal with that. But Lord, I dont think I have the ability. God says, Ill deal with that, too.Then look at what Moses said next Lord, please send someone else to do it.After all the legitimate concerns are met, Moses finally just blurts out the truth. What he said was, I dont want the responsibility. Its a good plan, Lord. The Hebrews need to be delivered. Pharaoh needs to be confronted. Its a great plan, but find somebody else to do it.By the way, have you ever noticed that all of us want to resolve God, but most of us want to do it in an consultatory capacity? Were quite an willing to sit back and tell God how it ought to be done. Now God has been willing to work through all the limited objections that Moses has had, God has been patient, but the Bible says that finally the Lords anger burned against Moses.And I think the reason that God was angry is because basically Moses was saying, God, you told me youre going to be there for me, you told me youre going to give me the authority I need, you told me youre going to be speaking through me, but I just dont think thats going to be enough. But even in his anger, God was gracious to Moses and gave him Aaron.JaneLet me ask a question why do you think God was so patient with Moses, and why is God so patient with us when we act the same way?DerekNow one answer is obvio usly because he loves us. But I think theres another answer.I think its also because he loves the people whose prayers hes calling on you and me to answer. Have you ever survey about that? Have you ever thought about the fact that the reason that God is calling you is because somebody else has been calling God?Back in Exodus chapter 2, the Hebrews were calling out to God, and God was concerned and he heard their prayers, so God turned to Moses and said, Ive a job for you to do.And I wonder how many times God has called you and said, OK, Ive got a lot of people praying for someone to help them, someone to teach them, and so Im calling on you to do something about it. Ill give you the ability. I just want you to go be my messenger. And you were reluctant to answer the phone. You had all sorts of excuses ready as to why you couldnt do it. Be assured that God is patient, but dont take his patience as an inability to see through our flimsy excuses.Moses said, Oh, come on now, be sensibl e, not me, Im a terrible speaker. Theyd never listen to me. And God said, Oh, for crying out loud, OK, Ill use your brother to help with the speaking. And Moses led Gods people out of disintegration.And Jonah said, Oh, come on now, be sensible, not me. Im not the type. And after a rather unexpected vacation in the fish just thinking things over, he talked to Gods people and led them Gods way.And Zechariah said, Oh come on now, be sensible, not me. My married woman and I are too old to have any kids. And God said, Oh shut up. And he did shut up. For nine months. And John was born, and the way for the Christ was undefendable up.And I heard a child say, I cant serve God. Im too newborn.And I heard a boy say, I cant serve God, Im not good enough.And I heard a woman say, I cant serve God, Im not skilled enough.I wonder if God ever gets any new problems?What is it that Gods calling you to do? I heard once about a fellow that was going to preacher training school. They were sending them out on weekends to preach in different churches. He was asked to preach at this one country church with just a few old people but he felt it was beneath his considerable skills. He made the mistake of actually making that comment out loud. It seems there was a young lady who overheard him and she said, You know, the worlds a better place because Michelangelo never said, I dont do ceilings.Think about it.This worlds a better place because Noah never said, I dont do animals.Because Abraham never said, I dont do travelling.Because Ruth never said, I dont do mothers-in-law.Because David never said, I dont do giants.Im glad Paul didnt say, I dont do correspondence.Im glad Jesus never said, I dont do crosses.And I think the world would be a better place if God didnt hear, I dont do quite as much.JanePaul wrote, We have such trust through Christ toward God. Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think of anything as being from ourselves, but our adequateness is from God.DerekGods only option is to use clay vessels. Thats all hes got. And thinking about the audience for Word Alive, Id say theres nothing but clay vessels that listen. Its simply a matter of whether or not were willing to leave alone God to work through us.I love the story that is told of the famous Polish pianist, Padarewski, who went on to become prime minister of Poland. He was touring the United States, and was going to give a concert one night. There was a mother who was trying to get her little boy interested in the piano, so she bought tickets to hear this master pianist. The show was supposed to start at 800 and prior to that people were standing around and visiting. This mother didnt realize that her son had slipped away. Imagine her shock when she heard and saw her son at the piano playing Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star. As the story is told, Padarewski walked out in his tux, sat down beside the boy and whispered, Dont stop playing. He put his left hand out and played some bass notes, put his right hand out and started playing, and he made this beautiful sound out of Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star. I want you to see that this describes so well what God does with you and me.God says, What do you have in your hand? A staff? Give it to me. And when God calls, you just give him whatever youve got in your hand. And once you allow God to use your life, he does things with it you would never dream possible.Maybe you need to respond to God and say, OK, here I am. I want to follow you. I want to serve you. I want to dedicate my life to you. No more excuses, no more delays. Just what do you want me to do?JaneDr. Derek Stringer is our Bible Teacher here on Word Alive and this is a Good News Broadcasting Association production.DerekMy thanks to Jane Moxon and my thanks to you for being with us today. entertain join us again next time as we continue to explore the life of Moses and how we can encounter God today.JaneThats Derek Stringer and Phil Critchley has been our Producer. F rom all here at Good News Broadcasting Association we send you our greetings. Good-bye and God bless.

Theoretical And Practical Approach To Theatre Making Theatre Essay

Theoretical And Pr playical Approach To Theatre Making Theatre EssayThis patch uncovers both the physiologic and scientific actions behind the presentation of the juncture. As an actor, theatre practitioner or theorist, we become aw atomic number 18 that the presentation of communication is not a mere exponent to speak, yet an action from a complex organ which is bound up with our emotions and discernment which directs our physiological reflexes. For Linklater, the conveying of emotion must(prenominal) mean the feeling of emotion since our voice is powered by our very breath. Breath is chemically and physically linked to the bodys capacity and state of serenity. The natural relaxed voice advances when the body is harmonious, relaxed and warm but any element of stress, excitement distraction can ca social function breath influxes which create tension and resonance which creates a new tone and inflection. (Linklater, 1976)Linklaters next piece continues that communication with the voice is not always the conveying of speech. However, in Western theatre it is recognised that speech and language is a primary form of expression. The voice and the actor must therefore become one. Both must be in their neutral state but not joined as they argon in the actors human life but rejoined, both neutral and aligned to negotiate the new adornment of character in which to convey new expression. In this soul the actors give imagery behind their speech must be put aside and a new imagery must come from the character, this must occur organically, through exercises and development. Only here can the actor and their voice become unique and spontaneous in their part.Furthermore the learning of lines must be abstracted into the heart creating an understanding betwixt the actor and their role. The actor must know more than the character in order to respond instinctively and naturally vocally within the action. (Linklater, 2006)Berry Vocal DevelopmentIn this chapter Berry f ocuses on the theory behind the vocal exercises he developed. These exercises help to convey how Linklaters ideas can be worked. For Berry the voice of the actor must be separated from the voice of the person and prec at one judgment of convictionived ideas. The way the individual communicates, their own anxieties and tensions must be distant in order to release full vocal potential. Berry laments that one can only get the best vocally if exercises are partaken. There are three grades of development for Berry. The first is relaxation and breathing. In this stage the actor develops the ability for vocal power by increasing the use of the lips and tongue. The indorsement stage is the application of this to the actors role. They must be aware that their own vocal inhibitions are bound up with their acting voice, and that what they hear is not what the audience hears. Relying on their own voice would lead to a predictable style of acting, instead the actor must use these exercise to free the voice and allow the emotion of the role to become one with the voice, preventing the need for predictable pushing out and expression of emotions. Finally the third stage is the belief in both the exercises and an understanding of the second stage to create vocal freedom. The development of the voice through these three stages of exercises will create a new freedom, allowing the voice to respond instinctively to the action, beyond thought and technicality of the actors thoughts, but instead naturally and freely. (Berry, 1978)Lecoq The Art of MimeContrary to mimics generic image of speechless and silent expression, Lecoqs writings on mime express the important of the voice and indeed the concepts of freedom in movement and vocal as discussed above. Fundamentally Lecoq rejects the notion of mime being the expression of words without sound. The clichd image of the mime, with exaggerated movements and facial expression, Lecoq would suggest fails to convey the practice of mi me and its true art form. Mime in its simplest form is the idea of imitation. hither we can understand the art of dramatic mime that Lecoq discusses. This is creation of a theatrical situation with the body, often involving the impersonation of peoples. Such artists create the illusion of the person they mimic, vocally, in body and action. Their art lies in the ability to be this person in alternate scenarios. The actor must feel the movement, gestures and emotions as if they are their own, only the theatrics occurs when the addition of the actors true self is added, their ownership of the movements produces the essence of mimicry. Symbolic mime requires the actor to partake in absolute mime, creating the environment and opening the audiences imagination. This requires a union of action, an understanding of the weight, placement and true abilities of the objects in the illusion. Finally there is the use of plastic mime, the use of the body as a language perhaps employ with the con straints of face masks. The body must convey the story whilst the face illuminates the emotion. Lecoq theories a system for conveying mime through exercises designed to able the body. However, Lecoq laments that this system of exercises once used must be discarded of a true and spontaneous performance is to be conveyed. The body moves spontaneously, with reflective action and the system of exercises must not prevent this. All rhythm is organic and no two rhythms are the same and this is key to the creation of the art of mime. (Lecoq, 2006)Jos Houben The Neutral MaskOnce once again this piece focuses on the freedom of expression necessary in acting. Through mask work, Shrubsall speaks of Houbens techniques, as inspired by Mosho Feldenkrais and Jacques Lecoq. The ability to separate and un-clutter ones own psychological science which lays behind all our human movement, readying the body for meaningful spontaneous movement using techniques such as understanding the relationship betwee n distinct parts of the body and their related movements. This is conveyed in the important of the mask in acting. The mask will only exist if there is a connection between the actor and the mask. They must become the mask. When the actor looks to the sky, the mask must convey this use of sight, his head expressing the movement and his back and shoulders responding as such. This piece is about the use of organic and functional movement, free from judgement and prior interpretation. (Shrubsall, 2002)Murray Practical ExercisesIn this chapter Murray attempts to produce a series of exercises in which to share the experience of Lecoqs theatre and understanding how to prepare ones body for theatre as expressed by Lecoq. Murray defines the fundamental principles behind Lecoqs theories and hence his exercises. It is the idea that essentially movement provokes emotion and the body remembers this. This chapter focuses in the main on the teaching of these actual exercises rather than the the ory behind but considers most primarily the bodys relationship between push and pull, balance and imbalance in the creation of Lecoqs work on tragedy, melodrama the neural mask and commedia delarte. (Murray, 2003)ConclusionThere is a theme within these readings, that of body and movement in space and time incorporating ideas of freedom without influence. In order to grasp this freedom the readings suggest that the use of exercises is of prime importance for the natural, free vocal and bodied actor. The muscles of the mind and body must be warm and content in order to open up the actors full potential. There is the suggestion that acting without such consideration is meaningless and insincere. That to act is to be free from our human constraints.

The Emotions of Captivity in Psalm 137 Essay -- expressing anger, lame

The book of psalm contains some of the most beloved pieces of watchword across centuries and cultures of this world. Psalms have been frequently cited is sermons, devotionals, movies, poetry, and songs. Most often, Psalms are attributed to King David of the 10th century BCE. But regardless of the authorship of the different psalms, apiece seem to carry a special place in describing human relationships to God, to country, to friends, to enemies and more. As time has progressed, certain psalms have become favorites because of their encouraging and intoxicate messages, such as the timeless Psalm 23.However, other psalms are neglected in Christian circles because of the awkwardy they present in rendition. Often, these psalms are overlooked because of their themes of apparent anger, resentment, or wrath. These psalms are not as frequently preached on or discussed, despite the fact that many believers would readily plagiarize 2 Tim 316, All Scripture is God-breathed and is use ful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work, (NIV). What then must the believer say about these difficult psalms?Psalm 137 is one of a selection of psalms that is frequently difficult to discuss because of its content. The pericope begins with what may appear as a lament like any other in the book, but ends with horrifying imagery of a coveted revenge. How does a believer give the proper respect due to the holy Scriptures among such vitriolic language? This paper will assert that proper interpretation of the following pericope involves careful attention to the historical and cultural background, structure, genre, and language of the written text.By... ...mans, 2000.Mc footn, J. Clinton. The Book of Psalms, The New Interpreters Bible. Nashville, TN Abingdon Press, 1996.Ogden, Graham S. Prophetic Oracles Against Foreign Nations and Psalms of Communal Lament The Relationship of Psalm 137 to Jeremiah 497-22 and Obadiah. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 24 (1982) 87-97.Rodd, Cyril S. Psalms 73-150, Epworth Preachers Commentary. London The Epworth Press, 1964.Savran, George. How Can We Sing a Song to the Lord? The Strategy of Lament in Psalm 137. Zeitschrift fr die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 112 (2000) 43-58.Schwartz, Stephen. On the Willows, in GodspellA melodious Based Upon the Gospel According to St. Mathew. New York, NY Arista Records, 1974. Youngblood, Ronald F., F. F. Bruce, and R. K. Harrison. Nelsons New Illustrated Bible Dictionary. Nashville, TN Thomas Nelson.

Riding Bikes and Raising Social Consciousness Essay example -- Persona

Riding Bikes and Raising Social ConsciousnessInstructors comment This assimilator invites his readers along for a bicycle ride, immersing us in the sights, smells, sounds, and physical sensations of a phenomenon unique to San Francisco. Along the way he educates us about the political and affable significance of the ridebut in such a genial, inclusive way that we may not even realize right away that weve been taught a lesson in social consciousness-raising. criti cal mass n. 2 an amount necessary or sufficient to have a significant effect or to give a result. Random House Websters College DictionaryOn the last Friday of each month, Tom, an amiable Jesuit Brother who loves cycling, my best friend, Ron, a few unhandy freshmen, and I would all(prenominal) meet at school around 500 p.m. We would all be dressed differently me in my jean shorts, a mothy tee shirt, and my purple helmet everyone else in a combination of blue jeans, sweaters, jackets, and red or white helmets. The colo rs of our helmets, clothing, and bicycles constituted at least a finished rainbow. Wasting no time, we would begin our migration, a race against the fog and its pursuing damp chill, to dominate the streets of San Francisco for one night as a unit, a voice, a symbol, and a mass. On this one night of each month, cars become the minority, the police blocking the intersections to allow the steady flow of 1500 cyclists to flow continuously like a giant, fluid serpent, oozing around the skyscrapers. Fueled by whoops, shouts, high-fives, clanging bells, screeching whistles, rattling chains and fenders, and the mesmerizing, silent symphony of blinking red lights, we would pedal all over the city for our own personal reasons and causes, but also for the ... ...Golden Gate Park by the well-maintained Victorian houses of the Castro and Lower Haight. Once on Kennedy Drive in the park, the entire Mass was about half its original size, since many people had split off and gone home along the cou rse of the ride. When we finally got to the Polo Field, everyone primed(p) their bikes down on the damp grass. The sun had already set, but there was just enough light in the sky to give it a macabre blue color. The temperature was moderate (in my opinion), but many were putting their jackets and sweaters back on, including Ron and Tom. The freshmen found us almost immediately. They said they had had a blast and managed to stay right at the front with the hotshots. Good for them. I, on the other hand, was glad to stay at the heart of the mass, where we were a part of something important and wonderful. We were a critical massa velo de force.